Technical debt, a waiting backlog, postponed features, or hiring constraints? Technical debt keeps growing.Your backlog keeps waiting.That feature keeps losing priority.Another hire is outside the budget.Technical debt keeps growing.Your micro-team.Senior technical leadership built in.
Interview and choose your senior developer and QA engineer. Every micro-team includes 4β8 hours of senior technical oversight each week, agreed around scope and complexity. The team works within your priorities, tools and process.
Interview and approve the people who will join your team.
Daily progress, in your tools.
See what the team is working on every day in your tools. Review working changes and test evidence together.
Know who takes the next step.
Every team member raises blockers requiring your onshore teamβs decision or action right away.
Agree scope, the weekly oversight allocation within the included 4β8 hours, insurance, and working hours before signing. You approve itemized infrastructure and tool costs before purchase.
Decisions for your roadmap
Modernize. Stabilize. Ship the next release.
Choose the business outcome, agree a bounded change, and review evidence before committing to the next step.
01Incremental .NET modernization
Modernize ASP.NET without a big-bang rewrite.
An application your business depends on is making every upgrade compete with customer-facing work.
Move agreed workflows to ASP.NET Core. It serves migrated routes; YARP forwards remaining requests to the existing ASP.NET application on .NET Framework.
You review
One working migrated workflow, checks for behavior, authentication and shared state, and a rollback plan agreed before cutover.
02Production performance & cloud cost
Fix slow software and rising Azure costs.
Timeouts, late reports, and repeated capacity increases consume staff time and infrastructure budget.
Trace an affected workflow through .NET, Microsoft SQL Server, and Microsoft Azure. Separate code and query bottlenecks from capacity and configuration issues.
You review
Baseline measurements, ranked changes with effort and tradeoffs, and a validation plan for an agreed business target. Implementation is scoped separately.
03Senior development & QA
Get critical releases out of the review-and-rework loop.
Features wait while your engineers review changes, fix regressions, and repeat manual checks.
Put a dedicated senior developer and QA engineer on the agreed backlog. Verify critical business workflows, including those changed by AI-generated code.
You review
Working software, repeatable behavioral tests, and remaining coverage gaps for your release decision.
Talk to Mottobits
What do you need the team to deliver?
Tell us about your application, the problem, and the result you need. We will discuss the people, scope, and price.